|
Jobs and Career Management in the Financial Markets, Banking & Finance |
|
| Job Seekers Sign in / Register |
Recruiter's Sign-in
|
| Careers Home | My eFinancialCareers | Find a Job | Post Resume |
Search by Company |
News & Advice |
Search Resumes |
Post a Job
|
TOP STORIES
Living dangerously: Diary of an ABS Professional, Week 18
8 April 2008COMMENTS
Perhaps it is time for UHNWI and HNWI to revisit that old and trusted institution: the Swiss Cantonal Bank, for that AAA feeling of security> Read all comments »In which Mr ABS ponders what went wrong at UBS, and prepares to reinvent himself as a distressed debt specialist.
UBS is a surprising casualty of the structured finance market. Whenever I used to speak to their clients I was told it was virtually impossible to secure a loan from the investment bank. Its structured finance team was minute. And yet, UBS has managed to pile up $38bn of losses.
How can this be? I hear from a friend at UBS that it has something to do with their purchase of Goldman Sachs’ CDO exposures when GS decided to exit the subprime market.
If this is true (which it may not be), then at the risk of appearing over-simplistic, there are two lessons to be learnt: be very cautious whenever a GS banker wants to sell you a piece of paper; and don’t listen to a UBS banker when he points you in the way of a good deal.
With hindsight, UBS’s recruitment strategy also seems questionable. Under Wilson Lee, the former head of their real estate division, my friend tells me the CMBS team remained small as Lee apparently thought (correctly it now seems) that the market had become too competitive and the margins didn’t reflect the amount of risk. However, management bought in a team from Credit Suisse for top dollar over the summer and ousted Lee before Christmas.
There is one point, however, where UBS appears to have excelled, and this is in not disclosing to the market the extent of its full losses before securing new capital. It avoided the risk of a run on the bank, but I doubt the new shareholders are particularly happy with their investment.
My UBS friend is in a bleak mood. His bonus for last year was small and paid in shares. Now he is more worried about keeping his job.
Luqman Arnorld, meanwhile, is joining my list of 2008 banking heroes (just behind Jérôme Kerviel). Arnold, who a few years ago was forced out of UBS, has recently been building a stake in the bank and seems happy to settle old accounts with his former employer even if it means criticising a strategy that he helped put in place when he was part of the management team. I cannot comment on whether it is Arnold’s personal money that is at risk in this venture – if it isn’t, that is what I would call true panache.
Closer to home, things are getting uncertain in my new shop. Some divisions could be downsized, but there’s talk of a distressed fund where I could potentially ‘add value.’
Once, in the distant past, I worked on some NPL deals, but my recollections are very vague. Although I was pretty junior at the time, I might soon have to claim that I invented the stuff if I want to avoid another game of musical chairs.
COMMENTS
Wizard of EC1, Tue 08 Apr 08
I remember a time when Swiss banks were the last bastions of prudent fiscal management, in tough times clients "fled to quality". Where now? I predict that the small banks will come out of this crisis better than the super mega banks that appear to have lost their focus. Perhaps a "flight to customer service and ethical practices" is the next market trend?
Add your comment »Anonymous, Information Technology, Tue 08 Apr 08
anyone who's bonus was paid in shares didn't do too badly last year... that means it was well over six figures, otherwise it would have been cash.
Add your comment »Giovanni, Risk Management, Tue 08 Apr 08
This proves how the rating agencies, the banks'risk modellers and the stupidity of selling variable rate mortgages for 95% of their maturity have all failed to sustain an economy based on CPs and bricks. The € zone isn't suffering the same for two main reasons: the possibility to choose the mortgage rate (the majority is fixed) for the whole life of the deal and the industrial output (tangible items) which are in constant demand despite the strong exchange rate.
Add your comment »David, Quantitative Analytics, Tue 08 Apr 08
I strongly agree with Giovanni's comment
Add your comment »Anonymous, Asset Management, Wed 09 Apr 08
@ Giovanni: The €zone isn't suffering because it didn't participate in a housing melt up not because they didn't lend at variable rates. The reason it didn't participate is because €zone countries still have a 8% reported unemployment rate. If there is no marginal demand, there is no asset price inflation. And if you look at the US economic data manufacturing is booming. Look at today's story about Auto OEMs pulling production back from ... yes you guessed it ... Europe so they can export $ manufactured cars to €zone customers. The € hasn't hurt ... yet.
Add your comment »Marcin, Risk Management, Thu 10 Apr 08
The EURO has shielded the Eurozone because the risk was diversified across member countries ECB injected funds to provide liquidity, the EURO has really reduced currency risk and a sell off seen recently in sterling and dollar, SAFE as EUROs not UK, US houses
Add your comment »Gary Wilson, HR & Recruitment, Fri 11 Apr 08
Perhaps it is time for UHNWI and HNWI to revisit that old and trusted institution: the Swiss Cantonal Bank, for that AAA feeling of security>
Add your comment »


