|
Jobs and Career Management in the Financial Markets, Banking & Finance |
|
| Job Seekers Sign in / Register |
Recruiter's Sign-in
|
| Careers Home | My eFinancialCareers | Find a Job | Post Resume |
Search by Company |
News & Advice |
Search Resumes |
Post a Job
|
TOP STORIES
Why I quit corporate finance…
2 July 2008COMMENTS
We can't say what he/she is doing now as to do so would be to divulge his/her identity. Suffice to say he (or she) is doing something and is not a figment of our collective imagination. Read all comments »Four years ago, almost to the day, I started work as an analyst in corporate finance. As is probably true of all new graduates, I was fresh faced and keener than mustard. In my own naive way, I was ready to handle anything and everything that could be thrown at me. I knew it meant hard work, but I was used to that, and I had a plan: two years as an analyst in corporate finance and then onto the bright lights of private equity.
In reality, I stayed in corporate finance for just short of four years and was never tempted by a move into private equity. But why did I stay on, and why did I go in the end?
Staying
The first two years I spent as a generalist (analyst), working in a number of different sectors in both client coverage and execution. I was paid two bonuses, the last of which was equal to my annual salary.
I worked on a number of deals, had exposure to senior bankers and attended countless client meetings. Even though I now had all this experience behind me, I felt I wasn’t ready to move to private equity; I still had a great deal to learn about corporate finance.
Going
As I moved towards my promotion to associate, I looked at the career progression in corporate finance and recognised that it was now set to slow down. After only three years on the job, I’m not saying that I knew all the ins and outs of corporate finance, but I had a good understanding of the basics. From now on, the emphasis was to be on gaining experience as I progressed through the ranks to vice president and then to director. There wouldn’t be many new concepts to learn, it would be about leading teams and ultimately entire projects.
The thought of being a managing director in corporate finance was attractive, but I decided I was not prepared to make the necessary sacrifices for the next 10 years.
What were these sacrifices? Well, during my time in corporate finance, I was unable to make concrete plans with my family or friends. In the end this lack of control coupled with a slow career progression made me realise I had to change my career to give me more control over my life. Most senior managing directors would regularly cancel holidays and other arrangements, and this was something I was no longer prepared to do.
Being a junior banker is a tough apprenticeship: you can lose weeks or even months of your life on a deal. But for the right type of individual, it’s exhilarating.
Three months after leaving corporate finance, I have not missed it for one second. I have many fond memories of my time as a banker, but none are sufficiently fond for me to go back in with my eyes open.
The author is a former corporate financier.
COMMENTS
Kunj, Accounting, Wed 02 Jul 08
It would be interesting to learn what the anonymous author is doing now. Can you tell us former corporate financier?
Add your comment »PE, Investment Banking / M & A, Wed 02 Jul 08
I am surprised it took the author 4(!) years to figure out it's not for him/her. I made it from Analyst to VP in less than 4 yrs and would have quit much sooner than that if I had realised it wasn't for me.
Add your comment »Me, Corporate Banking, Wed 02 Jul 08
am quite curious as well to know what he is doing now!
Add your comment »Sarah, Editor, eFinancialCareers, HR & Recruitment, Wed 02 Jul 08
We can't say what he/she is doing now as to do so would be to divulge his/her identity. Suffice to say he (or she) is doing something and is not a figment of our collective imagination.
Add your comment »Ex-CF, Asset Management, Wed 02 Jul 08
CF is mostly about presentation skills. Most CF bankers have poor sector knowledge which they are supposed to specialise, only can come up w crazy valuation. Only worth to stay 2-3 yrs & move on to PE after gaining the transaction, negotiation & documentation skills
Add your comment »PE, Investment Banking / M & A, Wed 02 Jul 08
I bet he/she is now an editor of eFinancialCareers! ;)
Add your comment »kalpesh jain, Student, Wed 02 Jul 08
well..its really sad to knw that it took 4 yrs....but than to how would one come to knw...which career is right for him/her... coz even i m planning to be one of them(CF).........!!!
Add your comment »Ex CF Now in PE, Private Equity / Venture Capital, Thu 03 Jul 08
Look back at my early career in CF, what I gain most is bluffing & dress in nice suit ($1k+ min is a must) to meet client senior management. I certainly find much more rewarding in PE now to really get the skills to pick a good investment & run it after acquisition – that’s not what I can get in CF. Buy side tend not to rely much on CF bankers advice except need them to dig out the potential targets from the crowd, as we know they contain much liquid inside their “pitch book” advice
Add your comment »


